Wino Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 The International Olympic Committee will choose a city to host the 2016 Summer Olympics on Friday in Copenhagen. The candidates are Tokyo, Rio, Madrid and Chicago. Who do you think will win? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smoker Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Madrid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wino Posted September 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Madrid.Maybe Madrid, but does the International Olympic Committee want to conduct the Games in Europe again after London 2012? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvdkeyes Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 I think Chicago would be a good choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyExpat Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 I am rooting for Pattaya. I think they could come up with a much more interesting set of games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 I am rooting for Pattaya. I think they could come up with a much more interesting set of games. Is leapfrog an official olympic game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Chang Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Tokyo is my guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvdkeyes Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Nude leapfrog would be fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Chang Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Politically incorrect for me to say this, but the Olympics is overated IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidTMike Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Rio all the way baby! One of the most amazing cities on earth. Don't see how they made it this far in the running. It is one of the most dangerous cities on earth as well. What kind of agreement would they have to make to ensure the safety of those traveling and/or competing there? If I were a betting man, I would take bets Rio is one hell of a longshot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Chang Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 If I were a betting man, I would take bets Rio is one hell of a longshot! I agree 100% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvdkeyes Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Why would you advocate "one of the most dangerous cities on earth" to host the Olympics? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Chang Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Why would you advocate "one of the most dangerous cities on earth" to host the Olympics? I guess cause it's not as dangerous as Lagos, Nigeria and a helluva lot more fun! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wino Posted September 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 I think Chicago would be a good choice. Many people are saying Chicago has a good chance. Seems they think Obama should go to Copenhagen to support Chicago's choice, like Blair did for London. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvdkeyes Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 I guess cause it's not as dangerous as Lagos, Nigeria and a helluva lot more fun! Lagos is not in the running. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Chang Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Lagos is not in the running. Lagos is the type of place where you're not even safe in your car at a red light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wino Posted September 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 I have never been to Rio, but if they are awarded the Olympics, I am sure they will clean up the dangerous elements. Like any big cities, there are probably areas that one does not want to enter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvdkeyes Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 They may be able to clean up the streets, but to clean up the drugs and violence is doubtful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaifan Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Good comments everybody!! I think Rio would be good and trust they could probably clean up their act, I also like the idea of Madrid but agree it is unlikely to be Europe two games running, Tokyo has done it before and did a great job but maybe too close to Beijing so I think Chicago has a very good chance and now Obama is adding his support by attending Copenhagen, this may well tip the balance. I can remember being newly arrived in Sydney when the announcement came of their success in winning the bid and then my pride at actually being involved as a volunteer, so I know the next few days will be a trying time for all contenders until the decision is finally announced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaifan Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 They may be able to clean up the streets, but to clean up the drugs and violence is doubtful.I have a gay friend from Seattle who has retired to Rio. He loves it but has suffered violent robberies twice for the first time in his life!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wino Posted September 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 I have a gay friend from Seattle who has retired to Rio. He loves it but has suffered violent robberies twice for the first time in his life!!Wow, I heard that Rio was dangerous, but thought like any big city you just have to know the areas to stay away from. Seems I may be wrong because I hear of many visitors being robbed. As far as the Olympic choice, it really does not matter to me, but looks like Chicago has a good chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wino Posted September 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 I heard of the four cities bidding for the games, Chicago has the lowest amount of public support. According to polls less than 50% of the city's residents support hosting the Olympics. On the flip side, there are some big names supporting Chicago's bid, among them Barack Obama, Oprah Winfrey, Michael Jordan and Michael Phelps. Looks like we will find out on Friday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvdkeyes Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Don't forget Michelle Obama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wino Posted October 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Don't forget Michelle Obama.How can we forget Michelle? She is more popular in some circles than hubbie, Barack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wino Posted October 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Here is a story about Obama's performance in Copenhagen. By JULIE PACE, Associated Press Writer Julie Pace, Associated Press Writer COPENHAGEN – Combining hometown pride and political muscle, President Barack Obama lobbied Olympic leaders on Friday to give the 2016 Summer Games to Chicago, saying a nation shaped by the people of the world "wants a chance to inspire it once more." The president and his wife, fellow Chicagoan Michelle Obama, put their capital behind an enormous campaign to win the Olympics bid. Never before had a U.S. president made such an in-person appeal. "I urge you to choose Chicago," Obama told members of the International Olympic Committee, many of whom he later mingled with as some snapped photos of him on their cell phones. "And if you do — if we walk this path together — then I promise you this: The city of Chicago and the United States of America will make the world proud," the president said. Chicago, Rio de Janeiro, Madrid and Tokyo have been making their cases to the IOC for more than a year, but many IOC members were believed to be undecided about which city they would vote for Friday. By the time the winning bid is announced, the Obamas should be back on a plane to Washington. The president's whirlwind trip put him in the Danish capital for less than five hours Friday, with Chicago-backers hoping that would be sufficient to give Obama's adopted home town the advantage it needed to win the close, four-way race to become the host city of the 2016 Summer Games. But the compressed time frame did not shield Obama from Republican criticism that he shouldn't be hopscotching to Europe in Air Force One when there were so many pressing issues to deal with at home. Asked by a reporter how he thought his pitch went, Obama gave a thumbs up — and he said the video montage of Chicago during the U.S. presentation made him miss home. "Obviously now it's up to the IOC members, but we are just grateful for the incredible hospitality," Obama said. He joked that only one part upset him: "They arranged for me to follow Michelle — that's always bad." Both Obamas spoke on deeply personal terms about Chicago, the city at the center of the world's spotlight so many times, including in November when the former Illinois senator won the White House. The president described Chicago as a city of diversity and warmth, a place where he finally found a home. "It's a city that works, from its first World's Fair more than a century ago to the World Cup we hosted in the nineties," Obama said. "We know how to put on big events." For all the anticipation surrounding Obama's appearance in Copenhagen, his arrival at the IOC meeting was decidedly subdued. The 100-plus committee members, who had already been warned not show bias during the presentations, sat silently as the Obamas walked into the Bella Center with the rest of 12-member Chicago delegation. Mrs. Obama gave a passionate account of what the games would mean to her father, who taught her as a girl how to throw punches better than the boys. She spoke fondly of growing up on the South Side of Chicago, sitting on her father's lap and cheering on Olympic athletes. She noted that her late father had multiple sclerosis, so she knows something about athletes who compete against tough odds. "Chicago's vision for the Olympic and Paralympic movement is about so much more than what we can offer the games," she said. "It's about what the games can offer all of us — it's about inspiring this generation and building a lasting legacy for the next." The president anchored the U.S. charm offensive. He referenced his own election as a moment when people from around the world gathered in Chicago to see the results last November and celebrate that "our diversity could be a source of strength." "There is nothing I would like more than to step just a few blocks from my family's home and with Michelle and our two girls welcome the world back to our neighborhood," Obama said. "At the beginning of this new century, the nation that has been shaped by people from around the world wants a chance to inspire it once more." In advance of Obama's arrival, Mrs. Obama did some high-powered lobbying for Chicago. The first lady has been in Copenhagen since Wednesday, holding one-on-one meetings with IOC members. "I'm sure you'd all agree that she's a pretty big selling point," the president told his audience. After the Obamas' comments, the U.S. delegation fielded questions from committee members, and at one point the president jumped in to answer. He said he envisioned that the Chicago games would allow the United States to restore its image as a place that, at its best, is "open to the world." He emphasized that the White House and the State Department would put their full weight behind making sure international visitors "feel welcome and will come away with the sense of the incredible diversity of the American people." And Americans, he said, will be reminded of their links to the rest of the world. Though IOC President Jacques Rogge has said heads of state aren't required to attend the IOC meeting, recent votes indicate their presence can make a difference. During the 2005 IOC meeting in Singapore, then-British Prime Minister Tony Blair successfully lobbied members on behalf of London's bid for the 2012 Summer Games. Two years later, Vladimir Putin, then president of Russia, helped secure the 2014 Winter Games for Sochi on Russia's Black Sea coast. Before leaving Copenhagen, the Obamas met briefly with Queen Margrethe II and Prince Consort Henrik. The president wrapped the trip by visiting Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen. Obama noted his interest in the pivotal climate change summit in Copenhagen in December but did not answer questions about whether he would attend it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts