Wino Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 Did I hear somewhere about Tiger's admission to the hospital for sex addiction treatment? I hope it helps. Maybe that will save his marriage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvdkeyes Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 I have heard of treatment for sex addiction, but never heard of being hospitalized for the treatment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Chang Posted January 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 Maybe that will save his marriage. I've often thought that if a marriage needs to be "saved" perhaps the folks shouldn't be married. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvdkeyes Posted January 15, 2010 Report Share Posted January 15, 2010 I can't agree with you. Relationships need work by both parties, especially if there is a problem; they don't just happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Chang Posted January 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 15, 2010 Relationships need work by both parties, especially if there is a problem; they don't just happen. I hear what you're saying. Guess u gotta know when to hold em and when to fold em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvdkeyes Posted January 15, 2010 Report Share Posted January 15, 2010 I agree, but first the work needs to be done if you want a relationship to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Chang Posted January 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 15, 2010 I think "sometimes" it's better for both parties not to force a mediocre relationship to work. Up to them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvdkeyes Posted January 15, 2010 Report Share Posted January 15, 2010 In Tiger's case there are children involved and I think if he and his wife can work out their problems it would be a good thing. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying they should stay together for the sake of the children. I am saying working on the relationship would be a benefit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted January 15, 2010 Report Share Posted January 15, 2010 In Tiger's case there are children involved and I think if he and his wife can work out their problems it would be a good thing. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying they should stay together for the sake of the children. I am saying working on the relationship would be a benefit. Absolutely. Like you said, any good relationship involves some effort by both parties. In Tiger's case, given the young age of the children, both parties should be exerting maximum efforts to get along for the sake of the kids. Even if they get divorced, they still need to support each other and be respectful of each other as life is simply too damn short to do it any other way (and, besides, they'll do a huge favor for the kids by doing so). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvdkeyes Posted January 16, 2010 Report Share Posted January 16, 2010 (and, besides, they'll do a huge favor for the kids by doing so). Not only for their children, but for society as a whole by not have more fucked up people running around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Chang Posted January 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2010 but for society as a whole by not have more fucked up people running around. That's also a good reason to abort. If a fetus is not wanted, chances are you'll get a fucked up kid running around. Back to the subject, either a happy marriage or a divorce where both parties put the interest of their kids first is best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wino Posted January 19, 2010 Report Share Posted January 19, 2010 Speaking of sex addiction treatment, I wonder if Bill Clinton secretly sought help? Any speculation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Chang Posted January 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 19, 2010 Speaking of sex addiction treatment, I wonder if Bill Clinton secretly sought help? Any speculation? My guess is no. He probably thinks it's normal. I also think it's perfectly normal for a man in his fifties to want to have "sexual relations" with a twentysomething. Must be frustrating that the POTUS, the most powerful man in the world, does not have the same freedom of sexual expression as most people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvdkeyes Posted January 19, 2010 Report Share Posted January 19, 2010 The problem was he was married and chose to have his fling in the oval office. Otherwise, I would agree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted January 19, 2010 Report Share Posted January 19, 2010 The problem was he was married and chose to have his fling in the oval office. Otherwise, I would agree with you. Actually, the fact he decided to do the bj in the oval office only showed to me his tackiness. His real screw-up (figuratively speaking, of course) was to do it with an intern who was an employee of the White House. Not trying to be too crude here but doesn't everyone know about the maxim against messing with the hired help? (and/or haven't they read about all the lawsuits against bosses/supervisors for messing with their employees). And, then again, Clinton's real and only crime was lying about it under oath. Another example of what the woman comedienne used to say about men: There ain't enough blood in the world to fill both heads and have them both work properly at the same time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wino Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Powerful men seem to get what they want, no matter if they are married, if they do it with the hired help, or if the sex act is performed in the oval office. The careful ones do it more discreetly. JFK was able to do almost anything without the press knowing and same with FDR. Those were different times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 JFK was able to do almost anything without the press knowing and same with FDR. Those were different times. True they were different times but not true that none of the press knew. But, back in the 60's and before, the press didn't print a lot of the private crap. After watergate, there seems to be nothing that's not fit to print about the President. I'm surprised they don't tell us if/when he has diarrhea (and, no, I have no clue if I spelled that right). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvdkeyes Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 That is the correct American spelling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wino Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 You would also be safe spelling it the British way, diarrhoea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Chang Posted January 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 diarrhoea. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. Hell...hehe...I'm certain how to spell it in Thai! (Can't do thai script here but English version would be "tawng sia"). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wino Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 I saw a report on TV about Tiger and his sex rehab in Mississippi. No sure if it was true or just that media crap, but they claimed he was going through lie detector testing because he had to come clean and face his past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Chang Posted January 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Sex rehab implies there's a problem. He was simply following his instincts. Society fowns upon this as he's married but I'd suggest that his wife has it pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wino Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Beer Chang stated, "Sex rehab implies there's a problem. He was simply following his instincts." What was it? Twelve or fourteen ladies on the side with a beautiful wife and kids at home. He has no problem and only following his instincts? Yea, right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Chang Posted February 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Instincts drive a male to have as many partners as possible. However, in modern society, a married man is expected to restrain himeself. But the instinct is still there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts